Raise engagement. Prove impact.
Scale your presence.
Most coaching evaluation justifies a programme. Ours sells the next one. We help you capture what changes in your coachees, quantify it, and turn the evidence into the case that fills the next cohort, earns the next sponsor, and lands the next contract.
The most important stakeholder questions
A corporate sponsor renewing an exec ed programme, a procurement team running an enterprise tender, a rankings panel reading your placement report, all ask the same two questions.
How high was proram engagement?
Showing up to the kickoff is not engagement. Buyers want to see participants stay across sessions, complete the work between them, and finish the programme they started. The graph that tracks it is the easiest sale you have.
Do you have data to prove the ROI?
Smile sheets and net-promoter scores measure satisfaction, not change. The next cohort, the next sponsor, and your ranking submission all need evidence that participants think, decide, and act differently because of the work.
Flyt maintains engagement in multi-semester programs and works with your KPIs to measure change. Together they turn coaching from a soft benefit into the differentiator.
Built so participants tell you the truth.
Most coaching evaluation collects feedback. Ours captures change. Four principles separate the two, and they are baked into every instrument we design.
Stop asking for ratings
"How useful was the session?" gets you a star count. You want phrasing that gets a person to look inward and the data shift is enormous. You stop measuring how participants felt about the experience and start measuring what the experience moved.
Measure across the whole arc
One survey at the end is too late and too thin. We measure after every session, at the midpoint, at the end, and again months later. Drift, plateaus, breakthroughs, and the change that actually sticks all show up in different places, and you see them all.
Leave room for the answer you did not anticipate
The most important thing a participant says about their coaching almost never fits a checkbox. Flyt pairs structured items with two or three open questions. One sentence in someone's own words moves a conversation more than a hundred high ratings with no context.
Only claims you can defend
Flyt produces evidence your team can put in front of a sponsor, a dean, or a ranking panel and stand behind. We measure what only the participant can know: what shifted inside, what stuck, what they now do differently. That discipline is what makes the rest of the data the kind stakeholders accept as proof, not interpret as marketing.
The question we get most: How often should evaluation questions be sent?
The biggest mistake is making evaluation feel like an extra task. When it arrives to your inbox when you finish the session as a five-minute checkpoint, every reflection sharpens the next session, and the feedback becomes part of the coaching itself.
After each session
A brief reflection captured. The engagement graph builds itself.
Midpoint review
A mid-programme pulse check. The evidence sponsors ask about, ready before they ask.
End of programme
A final review using the same items. The comparison is real, the report is ready to ship.
Longitudinal point - 12-36 months later
The change that survived the rest of life. The case study that wins your next contract.
Two departments. One coach network. Two revenue lines.
Career services runs coaching for students. Exec ed runs it for corporates. Same coaches, same evaluation framework, two budgets that fund each other.
- Student development
- Placement outcomes
- Rankings narrative
- Corporate programmes
- Sponsor renewals
- RFP wins and new contracts
Stronger placements, better rankings
- Outcomes that move rankings
- A development record for every cohort that admissions, alumni relations, and ranking submissions can all draw on
- A picture of cohort progress the school can point to year after year, with evidence behind every claim rather than anecdote
Evidence that wins tenders and renewals
- A board-ready impact report for every cohort, not a satisfaction survey
- Behaviour change measured against the metrics sponsors already report on: retention, performance, internal mobility, engagement
- A growing benchmark library, so each delivered programme sharpens the next tender response
Outputs designed to do commercial work.
Every output is shaped for the meetings that decide whether you grow. Sponsor renewals, RFP defences, dean's reports, accreditation submissions, ranking panels. The evidence does the talking.
Cohort dashboards
One operational picture across every active cohort. Engagement, completion, and reflection trends, filterable by programme, coach, or population.
Programme reports
End-of-programme summaries written for the rooms that matter. Drops straight into a sponsor deck or an RFP defence pack.
Longitudinal evidence
The follow-up most providers skip. Six to twelve months on, you have the case study that wins your next contract.
Show your next sponsor what coaching changed.
A 30-minute discovery call. We learn your programmes, your current evaluation, and the conversation you have to win, whether that is a sponsor renewal, an RFP defence, a dean's review, or a ranking submission. You leave with a draft instrument, whether or not you choose to work with us.